|
Definition - General AspectsPage 1 of 2For a long time, historians were considered to work with texts as their actual sources. For centuries historians were primarily men of letters who took their methodological apparatus from the study of ancient languages. Images in the form of drawings and paintings were reproduced in history books as mere illustrations in order to render publications more attractive with a higher illustrative value. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, the flood of images had begun to rise dramatically as a result of developments in photography, print media, film and television. The arrival of a new ‘iconographical age’ became apparent around the end of the century. This did not mean that images were automatically understood and taken seriously as historical sources. A naïve contemplation takes an image to be a direct and exact reproduction of reality. A scholarly contemplation and interpretation of an image, however, requires methodological training. In the following, the term ‘images’ comprises – based on their method of production – all types of paintings, portrayals in artistic craftwork (depictions in woven carpets, mosaics, gravestones, etc., graphical products (maps, reconstruction drawings, posters, stamps, caricatures, etc.) and photography, as well as ‘still pictures’ (scene photographs) from film and television; not, however, moving pictures. It is not the aesthetic quality of images that is the primary interest of historians; rather, they seek images that allow for statements regarding a past epoch, especially pertaining to:
|